Archive
You are currently browsing the archives for the Unusual Technology category.
By admin
From Russia about third eye (not a KGB eye)
In the scientific writing we can repeatedly read about various people who have “the third eye”. Such people posses the traits of an X-ray unit and can see through other people; they may also discern the biological structure of plants and other items.
Well-known Russian researcher for abnormal effects from the Russian city of Voronezh Anatoly Rodionov has been studying the exceptional phenomenon for over 40 years. The scientist has determined that the effect of “bio-introscopy” (diagnostic imaging) doesn’t disagree with the laws of nature and physics at all. In his book “Experimental Bio-introscopy” Anatoly Rodionov make available proof confirming that animated objects have biomagnetic fields; under some definite conditions these fields can be trapped with “the third eye”.
For many years Anatoly Rodionov worked as the chief counselor of the Russian gymnastics sport team. As the man possesses an exceptional talent of diagnostic imaging, he helped well-known sport athletes come back to sports after the official medicine definite a verdict on them. The press often mentions the gymnast Lyubov Burda from Voronezh who undergoes a course of therapeutic rehabilitation invented by Anatoly Rodionov. After that she revived and even won the title of a Soviet Union champion and an Olympic gold medal.
Anatoly Rodionov says that more or less every one can understand “the third eye” mystery. For this function it is important to build up the capability to perceive the most faint bioenergetics processes that cannot be seen with the normal vision; to learn to notice what other people cannot see.
Q - Now it is said that a regional information center for health regulation is to open at the Voronezh State University and that you plan to apply your unique program for studies with students at the center.
A - It is true that the center is to open. In truth, I am by now working with students. I have enrolled an experimental group of students from the University departments studying soil, biology, philosophy and psychology; students from other institutions want to attend the course as well. Some post-graduate students and tutors want to understand the secret of diagnostic imaging.
Q - Why do you say the group is experimental?
A - In fact, teaching of specialists in a new area of the biological science supposes significant knowledge; it demands laborious individual work. No result can be achieved without high nervous and emotional pressure that is equal to joint efforts of hypnosis, psychology and bioenergetics specialists directed at awakening of a man’s outstanding capabilities. These requirements are feasible for those people who evince genuine interest to the science of the future, which are more persistent, has flexible mind and can control the internal energy. It is feasible for highly emotional people.
If students just evidence some interest in bio-introscopy they may study it on an optional basis. I will be happy if any of these guys evinces even deeper interest to the subject.
Q - This is very often that new ideas are given a hostile reception. Do you feel it with respect to your studies?
A - I am rather lucky: the president of the Voronezh State University, deans from the University departments studying biology, soil, philosophy and psychology and other University officials have seen great interest in our studies. Especially for my lessons I was given a room; the University staff helped me adjust my lessons to the general schedule of the University lectures. In a word, I can say that I have achieved mutual understanding with the University personnel.
Q - You are actually lucky. Some philosopher said that just few minds die of wear, minds usually become rusty because of disuse.
A - Our scientific searching in the sphere of experimental bio-introscopy has come into contact with the philosophic ideas of the university scientists with their views upon what we call “the soul” now. I think that works of Professor Ivan Borisov are very interesting and important for my studies. Being a student of the history department of the Voronezh State University, he studied philosophy, especially works by Hegel, Kant and other great thinkers of the 17-18th centuries.
In his works, Ivan Borisov re-interpreted the views of the thinkers upon a man’s sensuality and considered it from a different point of view. I was impressed by a hypothesis of French philosopher Paul Holbach about some fragile and invisible substance. The philosopher said that the thing called a soul is moving together with us. Now, centuries later, the sensational hypothesis was objectively proved in practice. The experimental bio-introscopy has confirmed the hypothesis from a scientific point of view.
Moving together with the body, the soul, an information clot of the biomagnetic field is registered by a specialist having “the third eye” open. “The third eye” can read information even from a videotaped living object.
The complex of knowledge about diagnostic imaging is turning into a discipline of the university education. University scientists are publishing many works on the subject. If publications of this kind appeared in the 1970s, the medicine of that period would have helped anticipate frequent traumatism of professional athletes; instead, athletes were ordered to undergo electric stimulation of muscles.
The experimental bio-introscopy has identified the mechanism of traumas suffered by hockey players from the Soviet hockey squad. The problem was that electric impulses sent by electric stimulators were not identified. The biological membranes, our delicate regulator of cell activity, caught the impulses. When the traditional regime of low-frequency stimulation was changed, the level of traumatism in the hockey team considerably reduced. This fact was admitted by then-chief coach of the Soviet ice hockey team Viktor Tikhonov.
Q - How do institutions training doctors treat the diagnostic imaging?
A - Some time ago I worked at the medical institute’s chair for physical training, medical control and physiotherapy exercises. I was constantly saying that if I could I would make health infectious instead of diseases. My experiments in bio-introscopy have demonstrated the wholesome recovery of the organism as a result of physical training and rational sport. Bio-introscopy is now supported by the Voronezh Medical Academy President, Doctor of Medical Sciences Anatoly Faustov and other doctors. I hope that doctors will soon agree to lecture at the studies in our center.
Q - Do you think that bio-diagnostics can counterbalance the present-day instrumental medical diagnostics?
A - I think that no serious contradictions will arise under conditions of mutual understanding and interosculation. Bio-introscopy is the science of the 21st century.
We have considerably advanced in the researches. Humans now can identify primary functional disorders in the organism, slightly perceptible shifting of referred pains, for instance. The experimental center at the University is going not only to promote bio-introscopy but also to improve the parity relations between biology, biophysics, biotechnology, biomedicine and psychophysics on the one hand and modern medical achievements on the other hand.
By admin
Some traders are content with a trading method that only takes one type of strategy, but this doesn’t make sense if you want to make the most of the Forex market - or any market, for that matter. If the market isn’t always going in one direction, why have a system that only trades one direction?
The Forex Triad trading system was developed by Jason Fielder through what he termed as observations, combined knowledge from investing, and common sense. This system was formed with a common sense question: how can you make money off a system that isn’t applicable (or is wrong for the market) literally 2/3 of the time?
Basically, the market is always doing one of three things, and only one of three things. The market is either:
1. Trending
2. Counter-trending
3. Breaking out
That’s it. Those are the only three patterns that the Forex market can be in, and the market will always be in one of these three states. So how can a breakout method be profitable when the market wasn’t usually breaking out? Same for trend and counter-trend. Jason Fielder wasn’t the only one who thought this, as several Forex trading systems try to be “adaptable,” having various technical trading strategies set up so that when the market goes a certain way you know what to do.
There are several different Forex trading systems that now have multiple strategies for trading, all based on how the market is moving. The Triad Trading Formula was the system developed by Jason Fielder to adapt to the market.
A portfolio is something every trader and investor knows about. Spread the eggs around so the collapse of one market (see Enron) doesn’t wipe you out. So if that is commonly held as wise practice, why was everyone trying to find a single way to trade the Forex? Part of the reason for this might be that it’s easier to teach a trading strategy that only has to deal with one part of the market. Unfortunately, that’s not practical in a real life situation.
The Triad Formula of trading is a portfolio of strategies that gives a trader the tools to always be making money in the market, whether the market is trending, counter-trending, or entering a breakout.
This way, no matter what the market is doing, there’s a strategy that can be used to profit. In theory, this will allow you the steady and impressive profits that you’ve been yearning for all along, with as much security as can be found in the Forex market.
By admin
Polyominoes with Surround Number 3
The surround number of a polyomino is the number of different
ways that the polyomino can be surrounded by non-overlapping copies of the
same shape. A polyomino is considered surrounded if every unit edge is shared
completely by a neighboring polyomino.
Here are some polyominoes with surround number 3, and the people
who found them:
| Polyomino |
Author |
 |
Erich Friedman |
 |
Brendan Owen |
 |
Andrew Bayly |
 |
Joe DeVincentis |
By admin
Computer keyboard function key F3
A computer keyboard function key is a key which programmed or can be programmed so as to reason an operating system command interpreter or application program to complete definite actions. On some systems, function keys may have default actions, accessible on power-on.
Under MS-DOS, individual programs could decide what each function key meant to them, and the command line had its own actions (e.g., F3 copied to the current command prompt words from the previous command). Internet Explorer in Windows does not list this keystroke in the help menu, but still responds with a help window. F3 is commonly used to activate a search function in applications, often cycling through results on successive presses of the key. Shift + F3 are often used to search backwards. Some applications such as Visual Studio support Ctrl + F3 as a means of searching for the currently highlighted text elsewhere in a document.
By admin
In life, all people regardless of their age, sex, belief, etc, surely must face and tackle problems. This problem solving mechanism is a unique feature, that only present in human and has been with every body since they are born. Babies must face problems related to basic survival on their first days on earth. When they grow up, still they have to face problems related to social relationship, learning their first “ABC” and many more. The same pattern continue until they begin acting as adults when they have to face much bigger problems, such as problems related to work, etc. So problem solving is an immutable fact in human life.
Despite all those facts, there are still many people knocked out by their problems. One of the reasons is the varying perspective toward problems. Some people would consider problems as obstacles to success while other perceive them as challenges and opportunities to grow. These different approaches to problems will generate different results. Those who might consider problems, as obstacles will be drowned by their problems, while others can emerge and grow by the challenges.
There are times when we don’t have the ability to solve problems by our self. That’s the time when we need others for support. There are many terms to describe this scenario; teamwork, collaboration, cooperation and many more. One question that may arise related to teamwork is how many people should involve in teamwork to make it optimal? Surely extra heads would do much favor than one, but from scientific view there’s a strong need to specify what number exactly needed?
Triggered by this question, researchers
at University of Illinois did the study on this matter, teamwork. The investigators enrolled 760 of the school’s students to solve complex letter and word problems. Some toiled as individuals while others functioned in-group of two, three, four or five. The groups of three, four and five performed better than any set of individuals.
The dynamic is sensitive, however. Teams of two performed at the same level as two separate people, suggesting it’s too small to foster the dynamics that create optimal problem solving. Also interesting is that groups of three, four and five did equally well compared with one another; there was no advantage to adding people beyond a trio.
Study leader Patrick R. Laughlin says that in addition to tackling workplace challenges, problem-solving groups might enhance classroom learning. Further research is needed to determine whether student groups perform better than individuals do in academic settings and, if so, at what ages and test.
By admin
In the world of search engine optimisation the ‘big three’, that is Google, MSN and Yahoo are regarded to be the focus of any optimization effort. These three search engines however all use algorithms which although similar, are different enough to bring diverse results for the same key terms. Despite the differences, through effective measures it is possible to achieve good rankings in all three. Most SEO specialists see this as the biggest challenge, to achieve good rankings in the ‘big three’ simultaneously.
The ‘big three’ may have differing methods but ultimately their objectives are the same. This is to supply the user with the most relevant and useful results for any particular search term. This is why, with specialist knowledge it is possible to achieve high rankings in all three engines. Obviously however, if the key terms being targeted are too generic and competitive, achieving top spot in all of the ‘big three’ is an exceptionally difficult task. Subsequently when selecting keywords it is essential to find a balance between competition and specialisation. Too generic and competition will be too high, too specific and the search volume will be too low.
Most search engine optimisation industry workers will agree that in terms of difficulty MSN, Yahoo and Google differ; MSN usually being the easiest to achieve rankings, followed by Yahoo and then Google.
MSN requires an approach than is heavily link focussed, although content is still important. MSN tends to be the fastest of the three to pick up on changes in content and links and hence will yield results more quickly. Some analysts estimate that although MSN is considered the third most popular engine, the users are over ten percent more likely to buy the items they are looking at in comparison to Google and Yahoo. In terms of results, six months will be the benchmark of success in MSN, this is however dependent upon the competition for the search terms.
When you are optimizing a page for the MSN search engine, you should place importance in weaving a theme around your site, and build up a number of relevant backlinks or those links that point to your site from an external source.
Of the three, MSN is the easiest for SEO specialists to optimize for. This is because it easily sees newly posted content and inbound links, so even if your site is new it still stands a chance for high ranking if the theme requirement is met and has a solid number of inbound links. At this time, MSN does not weigh links value through age and history like the other two engines do, so it is relatively easier to gain a higher ranking in MSN.
Some people would probably not bother around in concentrating SEO efforts for MSN since it is the less used engine among all three, but data show that MSN users participate in e-commerce transactions more than the users of the other two engines. Thus, if you are engaged in Internet marketing, you should keep in mind to structure your site effectively for MSN.
Yahoo generally uses the same methods of operation as MSN meaning that optimization for one will normally produce results in both. Yahoo in recent years however have decided to pursue similar methods as the market leader Google. This move is probably an attempt to court some of the millions of people who use Google to instead choose Yahoo. Part of this effort has focused on creating greater emphasis on the temporal nature of links, meaning that sights with relevant and recent links will rank higher. This does however mean that optimizers must have a constant approach if they want to achieve consistent results in Yahoo.
Yahoo for a large part of its development relied upon the same sort of system than MSN, making search engine optimisation relatively simple for the two of them. However, of late Yahoo have switched and started to follow the Google example. This is most probably due to the huge popularity of Google, and its dominant position in the search engine industry.
Yahoo has begun to place an emphasis upon the temporal nature of links making optimisation a constant effort if Yahoo is the focus. It also lengthens the optimisation process but makes efforts ultimately worthwhile as aged links are highly respected.
SEO efforts for Yahoo! until recently have been similar in nature to tactics used in structuring a page to gain a high rank in MSN. In short, if you can optimize your page for MSN, you won’t have to do anything much for Yahoo!
However, Yahoo has recently adopted an algorithm that is similar to Google including the age delay factor. Just like Google, SEOs could expect for some considerable delay before the inbound links that they have built for a site can gain some value in the calculation of ranking among Yahoo’s search engine results.
Naturally Google is the primary focus for all SEO specialists. As the world’s most popular search engine it creates more traffic than both of the others combined. Ethical methods of optimization are most worthwhile with Google as operatives are adept at picking up black hat techniques. Content is king and holds a great deal of sway when it comes to compiling rankings; as do the number of links to a site. Out of the ‘big three’ results in Google will take the longest but ultimately are the most worthwhile.
Google uses a strict algorithm to filter out sites for relevance to its users search queries and is the most difficult to optimize for. Unfortunately for many SEO specialists, Google also holds the spot for having the most people using it for searches. This means that webmasters (clients for search engine optimizers) are more likely to give you instructions to optimize them for Google.
With its latest update (nicknamed Jagger), Google has implemented an age delay criteria. This delay means that as time passes, inbound links to your site gain more and more weight. This is good news for those who have managed to stay around long in the World Wide Web and have built significant numbers of links. However, this could mean more difficulty in SEO efforts for newly established sites.
Like MSN, Google also places weight to a site’s relevancy to a theme instead of just singular keywords. Sites that have more relevant internal pages than irrelevant ones are more likely to earn the top spot in Google’s results.
When pursuing optimisation it is normally the case that by applying methods that work best in Google, results will be forthcoming in the other two. By striving to create well written, structured and constructed content success will be attainable. Success will not be immediate however, optimisation is a long game that only brings high rankings and increased traffic in an elongated period of time.
Search engine optimisation is usually concerned with ‘the big three’ of the search engine industry. The problem is that each of these search engines has a different algorithm and different sets of rules, some sites, through efficient optimisation have managed to get to number one on all of them. That is the challenge set to most optimisers, with three major websites that mange the traffic of millions, the other, minor search engines are simply not worth the pursuit of optimisation.
While the big three have different algorithm and systems, ultimately their goals are the same; to provide the user with the most relevant results. This means that despite their different methods it is possible to pursue optimisation simultaneously.
That said if using search engine for highly competitive phrases it will be hard to reach a triple number one spot. Choosing the right level of competition for search terms is essential, if competition is too high it will be hard to keep rankings, too easy and you will find that the search terms are rarely used and traffic to your site will suffer.
To discuss methods of search engine optimisation for all three it is easier to discuss them singularly. What must be considered is that MSN is usually the simplest, followed by Yahoo and then the jewel in the crown for any optimisation company; Google.
Performing search engine optimisation for MSN means creating a site with a distinct theme and many links. MSN tends to pick up on changes more quickly then the other two making the process considerably quicker if focussing on results purely on MSN.
Despite its number three place in popularity, it is believed MSN searchers are nearly fifty percent more likely to purchase items than other search engine users. Most importantly is to create a solid site with a coherent theme throughout. Linking should bring results in a matter of months.
Google is the focus for much of the search engine optimisation industry, as the world’s most popular search engine, this is unsurprising. Rankings in Google are the hardest to obtain but the traffic created is the highest in number. The usual ethical methods of optimisation apply; unique content, a large amount of that content and well built links are all vital for high rankings. It takes the longest of any of the others but rewards are the largest. Time is a factor as more emphasis is placed upon the history of a page than the other search engines.
Logically your first goal is to target MSN as the easiest of the three, then Yahoo and finally Google. However, seemingly if you are doing things right for one search engine results in the other two will follow. Naturally Google will be the primary objective but the amount of traffic from the other two is still sizeable.
If you follow the general principles of creating large amounts of unique, relevant content and high quality links your site will start to climb up the rankings. Do not however expect immediate success; optimisation campaigns for all three will take time, all require an elongated effort to achieve decent rankings.
Tips in Optimizing Pages for All Three Engines
Now that you have understood how each engine arrives at each search result’s ranking, you can then plan your SEO tactics accordingly so that you could gain some rank for each of them.
As you could see, each of them place similar emphasis for website content. This means that you should first concentrate of building content that satisfies these engines theme density requirements. Your SEO efforts at this point should focus on building content that is built around a certain theme, and you should putting pages that deviate from it lest you want to lose some of your points for relevancy.
Link building for your website is still important, however, MSN treats links differently from the way Yahoo and Google does. With their age factor, it would take you some time before you could gain your desired ranks in those two engines.
However, MSN offers you an avenue to gain a top rank with your inbound links because it has no age delay criterion. As your links gain in age, they would naturally gain some weight with Yahoo and Google. Thus, you should first concentrate your efforts in ranking in MSN through inbound links and expect a similar result to follow after a while in Yahoo! and Google.
